Subject: Re: [9front] Pitch for devskel
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 11:24:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3FCC338E819E63FBE74309787B11EA6@eigenstate.org> (raw)
Quoth Jacob Moody <email@example.com>:
> You _can_ just bind things in to your namespace,
> and if you did you just wouldn't need auth/box.
> The point of auth/box is take potentially deeply
> nested/relative paths and to mimic that hierarchy
> the the new root. Due to the restriction of devskel
> to only permit one skeleton per attach. Mimicking some
> hierarchies can be tedious. This removes that tedium.
I'm not disagreeing with that; I'm wondering if we can
drop the device munging part of it, and instead fix
references to '#'-devs throughout the tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-06 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-05 0:57 Jacob Moody
2022-06-06 3:16 ` Jacob Moody
2022-06-06 6:41 ` Jacob Moody
2022-06-06 14:40 ` ori
2022-06-06 15:08 ` Jacob Moody
2022-06-06 15:24 ` ori [this message]
2022-06-06 15:31 ` Jacob Moody
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).