From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ds.inri.net ([107.191.103.21]) by ur; Fri Jun 3 14:45:55 EDT 2016 Received: from [10.183.22.90] ([166.170.221.198]) by ds; Fri Jun 3 14:45:54 EDT 2016 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9front] State of the 9front mailing list archives From: stanley lieber Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 14:45:42 -0400 To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: stable immutable descriptor core locator In the case of the guy trying to update his auth server, the information wa= s already in the fqa=2E Granted, the requirement for performing this proced= ure after the old protocol was disabled by default was never made clear to = anyone=2E Shit just suddenly broke=2E If someone happened to be on IRC when= people were discussing it they might have picked up a clue=2E I probably c= ould have handled this better by at least putting a notice in a release ann= ouncement=2E In my previous mail I was responding more to the same discussion that gets= held over and over on IRC by the same people about how accessing the maili= ng list archive is awkward and slow=2E Everyone always concludes they haven= 't studied the problem closely and then the topic dies for a while until it= 's time to complain again=2E The solutions always involve handing off respo= nsibility to some third party service (read: Linux)=2E In this case I think gmane is a great idea=2E Hopefully the person who sug= gested it will contact me and tell me what I need to do to make it happen= =2E sl