From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 6167 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2023 19:35:54 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Aug 2023 19:35:54 -0000
Received: from ftrv.se ([45.76.35.157]) by 9front; Thu Aug 10 15:33:33 -0400 2023
Message-ID: <DA9CFB01580BF630DDE20DA88CCC3208@ftrv.se>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftrv.se; s=mail;
	t=1691696009; bh=Au+wkYtrbirKnr5O9wJegPJ+tDjAfXeVuknqQ9km+IE=;
	h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To;
	b=gaLFU91gTt9iqQL+iWJVxri35dbicq55MUgYvjeb1p1Ophun4SUqYf81zFqDi7pYB
	 CGgwRChRLGG1V5Uct2qu6odJ/jsNMI8dAdRgrkkouQOkf2aqZCtRLMkRcc0ZJCtT2q
	 +t0VEp/jhCcjyJ1EdfqVvrhKsp9vwosdD7ua7yGw=
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:33:27 +0200
From: =?utf-8?q?Sigrid_Solveig_Hafl=C3=ADnud=C3=B3ttir?= <sigrid@ftrv.se>
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO-nES+NCae2RbcvqO3cRDbe=Xcj+_aKB_0zOkpxFvgQ4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: responsive high-performance-based framework lifecycle rich-client layer 
Subject: Re: [9front] "Touching the Artwork" strikes again
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

> > We have discussions on #cat-v and on grid.
> 
> Or, in this case, on the list.

Right, except Exit was discussed back and forth on both channels I
mentioned, while being developed and after, with many opinions
considered.  We arrived at where we are now based on the result of
those discussions.  It wasn't just one person secretly git/push'ing.

> > But no, better speculate elsewhere (reddit, discord, whatever)
> > then complain about artwork touching here, on the ML.
> 
> I'm "speculating" on the list, although I don't know why you'd say
> speculating when all the following are just facts.
> 
> Exit sounds like it could mean to close, plus it's easier to find in
> the menu than Delete is.

That is a speculation, not a fact.  Maybe for you personally this is
confusing? Quoting the author of the video you linked:

	< nzm_> hey, I just saw on ML someone mentioned my presentation
		- happy you found it but my error was oddly trivial and I'm not sure
		what the issue is

> Exit is something nobody wants unless they're advanced enough to know
> about hidden menu commands.

That is a speculation.  Several people wanted an Exit and it was
enough "wants" to get it in.