From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7712 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2021 16:47:02 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Feb 2021 16:47:02 -0000 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Tue Feb 9 11:41:10 -0500 2021 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([104.59.85.219]) by 5ess; Tue Feb 9 11:41:09 -0500 2021 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 11:41:07 -0500 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <0951F0EBDBBBBC7C75B4042E1D52878F@hog> References: <0951F0EBDBBBBC7C75B4042E1D52878F@hog> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: flexible service high-performance-oriented XML replication extension CSS frontend Subject: Re: [9front] transient dns errors cause smtp failure Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On February 9, 2021 10:58:41 AM EST, kvik@a-b=2Exyz wrote: >Quoth Stanley Lieber : >> i cranked Maxreqtm to 30*1000 and it's already making a huge difference= cleaning out the queue=2E we'll see how it plays out=2E > >I'm only now receiving this reply=2E > >The list may not be fast but at least it's steaming=2E > > general fyi: i've kept the ndb change (now cranked to 60*1000) but restored my original= runq configuration (runq -n 10 in /mail/lib/qmail, and runq -n 20 every fi= ve minutes via cron)=2E since last night, old messages that had been stuck in the queue for as lon= g as two days are gradually filing out=2E fist time we've seen under 2,000 = files in the queue since the trouble was noticed=2E total queue continues to decrease even as new messages have been sent to t= he list (and received, in my inbox at least)=2E sl