From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7C423D63
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Fri, 17 May 2024 00:21:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]) by 9front; Thu May 16 18:19:33 -0400 2024
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBA828983
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 16 May 2024 18:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from me+unobe@fallglow.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id
	:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Mg6p9UcauYuzhL2/TRYEXfES5
	LKa9P1/5dkwMvFupmo=; b=AzN/W0FYVH2SJcBDbkWa3Idd8b+IJ79VtMsCvh1LL
	7Z3DoIeQCI7DGmHmywLX521L39uiKIog7YIvskBSt/9R6+1ulZU2SlljaNLbDG0f
	dN+7cymKXuCR2ahKVbHj/HDKE6yBhhtBOYUKtvBc3SsgXCdrW9xyrNSR8Rem00G0
	Bk=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B6228982
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 16 May 2024 18:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from me+unobe@fallglow.com)
Received: from strider.localdomain (unknown [47.37.156.153])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D71D28981
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 16 May 2024 18:19:30 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from me+unobe@fallglow.com)
Message-ID: <E87921D07364B0CC69AAD145361B45D3@smtp.pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:19:29 -0700
From: Romano <me+unobe@fallglow.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <317F730505EE7FCCC0697ACCEFECC36F@smtp.pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pobox-Relay-ID:
 5D83CF96-13D2-11EF-B22B-78DCEB2EC81B-09620299!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: scale-out immutable base-oriented event-aware WEB2.0 over ACPI realtime markup 
Subject: Re: [9front] ramfs usage
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Oy. I see two typos in the man page that I introduced: a
missing 'The' before describing the -i flag and misspelling
of explicity.

From: Romano <me+git@fallglow.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 22:18:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ramfs: fix typos in man page

---
diff 0b55b43b99d97129a0ca0731243d1edc7bbbb6ae b373869e8319c8d25b27db40929e5d19c1371659
--- a/sys/man/4/ramfs
+++ b/sys/man/4/ramfs
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
 .B -D
 flag enables a trace of general debugging messages.
 .PP
+The
 .B -i
 flag tells
 .I ramfs
@@ -82,7 +83,7 @@
 .B /tmp ,
 however it will use the mountpoint
 .IR mountpoint
-explicit;y set using the
+explicitly set using the
 .B -m
 flag.
 .I Ramfs