From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 1717 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2021 20:59:48 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Feb 2021 20:59:48 -0000 Received: from outgoing.selfhost.de ([82.98.82.6]) by 1ess; Fri Feb 12 15:55:02 -0500 2021 Received: (qmail 939 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2021 20:54:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx03.bss-wf.de) (postmaster@emdtgvmf.mail.selfhost.de@84.150.39.186) by mailout.selfhost.de with ESMTPA; 12 Feb 2021 20:54:44 -0000 Received: by mx03.bss-wf.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A075E3DD76; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:54:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from 9pi.pala (p5b3bcb58.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.59.203.88]) by mx03.bss-wf.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D15853DD74; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:54:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: 9front@9front.org Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:54:43 +0100 From: theinicke@bss-wf.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: dependency CSS XML service-scale rich-client backend Subject: [9front] Mail rewrite; open path with stored mails Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk I have noticed that Mail/Nail does no longer open additional mailboxes if passed a path [containing mails as undecoded MIME messages]. Now I am wondering whether this is by design or it is desirable to reintroduce this. That said I can imagine some possibilities for reintroduction: 1) change argv parsing to interpret argument like old Mail did (e.g. mbox | path) 1a) also reintroduce second optional argument to open mailbox with given mboxname - imho unnecessary, but backwards compatibility? 2) introduce this via an additional parameter 3) just do it using a script I could provide a patch implementing it, but I am not sure whether this was left out by design (e.g. because if one needed it one could easily do this with a script) and which solution to favor, thoughts? -- Tobias Heinicke