From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from cmo-0002.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.172]) by ewsd; Sat May 23 20:02:07 EDT 2020
Received: from cmr-0000.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.117])
	by cmo with ESMTP
	id ce0ZjDkb49WNkce5bjyf9w; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:02:03 +0900
Received: from pi4.jitaku.localdomain ([128.27.33.196])
	by cmr with ESMTPA
	id ce5bjERjAoVEWce5bjB2nL; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:02:03 +0900
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hera.eonet.ne.jp;
	s=x01; t=1590278523; i=kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp;
	bh=1Xat8B6LeOfizTeQLdZETXRwVIfoqTI1jHQr+D4qWV8=;
	h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To;
	b=CB59Pg+jqdLS0h5hrobnk3358hgQBtOYPPsS7O2fegmkd4fYs+eGCL/PiK9odO3Lz
	 ltrdy0Ti8DxKy4UC9HWFQ0vg+wqwCeTqxRd0Qwa8vfduj3HxEoB+yzqfWjmxnUMxdD
	 sQCIo9I981wsudqgEngQhxgigegPU7kwgOa/UWfYeqjTA8Guw3XsqEY93PxNVabxa8
	 v1LuL6m19Eow19Bup6xKRD9tBtGem4JtpR8jVcIvHuTcp228ikEd30gdf/WMX0rSI4
	 AbZIJN73X9tX9per0hzI+EhVVLDzoQPjOJ4kzpc1hQ54Jd+KAzCrXXVkIcU8YmqOu7
	 1lwIFxVbtiXSQ==
Message-ID: <F1510711E0D86E7594B0603037124956@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] netsurf native frontend
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 09:02:01 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
In-Reply-To: <ee4862d7e971c102065c5901dc459b76@oboj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: stable ISO-certified polling singleton 

Thanks Jonas!
Yes, I wanted to see this like technical background.

> It is an advantage that we now have two frontends for plan 9, as they 
> can be compared both visually and performance wise. I've already noticed 
> that the native frontend is much quicker if you rcpu to another machine 
> and run the browser from there.

Yes, it may be, however, we don't see jpg/png images yet, which make
the load page very slow...

By the way, nsgenbind() is not used, why... (This is my first time to update
nsport☺)

Kenji