From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A9324E34
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:03:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.82.67]) by 9front; Fri Jul 26 00:02:44 -0400 2024
Message-ID: <F3A6E4F4975C50BD162329EAF8EA0682@gaff.inri.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:02:43 -0400
From: sl@stanleylieber.com
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <E5DACDE1B7A6F4EB9E9CFEE687D5E4C0@smtp.pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: proven app enhancement-based software 
Subject: Re: [9front] WANTED: ip based filtering of incoming connections
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

>> apologies for the noise, but i've just verified the following doesn't actually work:
>> …
>> 	aux/dial 'ipmux!vers=4;src=47.128.0.0&255.252.0.0|52.230.152.0&255.255.255.0|64.249.68.0&255.255.255.0|64.249.79.0&255.255.255.0|64.249.83.0&255.255.255.0|85.208.96.0&255.255.255.0|156.59.198.0&255.255.255.0' >/dev/null
> 
>  From ip(3), it describes the parameter for ipmux should be ver,
> not vers. Might it be as simple as that?

seems to have just ignored the invalid argument vers. it did work (even with the
invalid argument) when i only specified one ip address to block.

sl