From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 16505 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2021 18:08:58 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 21 Jan 2021 18:08:58 -0000
Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Thu Jan 21 12:36:29 -0500 2021
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([104.59.85.219]) by 5ess; Thu Jan 21 12:36:28 -0500 2021
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:27 -0500
From: Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <e3731a6b-536f-4eeb-b4ff-99fbf4b1dd4d@sirjofri.de>
References: <154A2B81E5307985989F46BE958ACBAC@eigenstate.org> <e3731a6b-536f-4eeb-b4ff-99fbf4b1dd4d@sirjofri.de>
Message-ID: <F5EE84AC-F5A1-4495-A750-F9B0B4C507A5@stanleylieber.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: package plugin content-driven engine-oriented control 
Subject: Re: [9front] user none: cwfs vs hjfs
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On January 21, 2021 12:05:58 PM EST, sirjofri <sirjofri+ml-9front@sirjofri=
=2Ede> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>just a sidenote, the paper about 9 (/sys/doc/9=2Eps) also mentions the=20
>behavior of none, it basically always has world permissions, independent=
=20
>of the ownership, iirc=2E
>
>sirjofri
>

yes, the whole problem here is hjfs does something different=2E i've been =
on hjfs so long i became accustomed to its behavior and expected it everywh=
ere=2E

fixing hjfs may break assumptions in some people's setups=2E

sl