From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by ewsd; Wed Nov 28 15:41:00 EST 2018 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 21:40:52 +0100 From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] bug: hg pull fails on a bitbucket repo In-Reply-To: CAH_zEu7R-htQZEGCH42AEs0VSCA5abM=rhMp-RXDQsFUU1nysQ@mail.gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: managed JSON information database noted. on very low priority for me as i dont have much time and like working on plan9 problems rather than python ones. this would mostly consist of doing tons of testing to see if there are any operational issues with the new python code. not just cloning bitbucket repos but actually do commits, merge, remove, add, diff ect... also wonder if our repo format is still fully supported. as people will not manually nuke ther /dist/.hg. see if hg serve still works... maybe add support for new repo formats to hgfs... also, how big are the differences? have you diffed the python code and can say how big the changes in mercurial are? -- cinap