From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]) by ewsd; Thu Sep 13 06:19:16 EDT 2018 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:tenox@sdf.lonestar.org [205.166.94.16]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id w8DAId6E014700 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:18:39 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:18:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Antoni Sawicki X-X-Sender: tenox@sdf.lonestar.org To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] bounty for 9pi update for 9front In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <70AD52DD-62CC-48BF-A53D-5EED10FC1278@yahoo.ca> <6E20CCC0-050D-45FC-A191-D2B76137A95C@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: private session WEB2.0 descriptor-scale general-purpose hypervisor interface USB patches are not a requisite for the bounty. If 9front RPI image works at least as good as Richard's 9pi image from April it's fine. Bugs can be fixed later.