From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]) by ewsd; Thu Sep 13 16:29:57 EDT 2018
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:tenox@sdf.lonestar.org [205.166.94.16])
	by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id w8DKTK7U013144
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 20:29:20 GMT
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 20:29:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Antoni Sawicki <tenox@SDF.ORG>
X-X-Sender: tenox@sdf.lonestar.org
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] bounty for 9pi update for 9front
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1809131529010.15422@phi>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1809132028590.4496@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1809120508170.1816@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1809131529010.15422@phi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: self-signing callback-based control 

> Sending hardware to cinap is the best way to ensure that it works with the 
> least amount of effort and will continue to work in the future.

Good point, I will do that regardless of the bounty.