From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7697 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 19:08:05 -0000 Received: from mars2.inri.net (HELO 1ess.inri.net) (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 19:08:05 -0000 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 5 14:04:41 -0500 2021 Received: (qmail 46656 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Jan 2021 10:57:41 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:57:41 -0800 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <308487BE-59A5-4F01-8D64-6DBD9B0FB565@stanleylieber.com> <9EA4B59167BC6F9B36B6EA285140E19F@musolino.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: descriptor standard rails Subject: Re: [9front] test new server Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:55:10AM +0100, hiro wrote: > i can confirm both tests got received, but gmail thinks it's spam. > > no idea why, as SPF passes fine. gmail's latest idiocy: if an MTA does not have an ipv6 address, any messages it emits are flagged as spam until users train it otherwise. khm