From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 26876 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 21:42:14 -0000 Received: from mars2.inri.net (HELO 1ess.inri.net) (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 21:42:14 -0000 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 5 16:26:19 -0500 2021 Received: (qmail 50081 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Jan 2021 13:26:11 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:26:11 -0800 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <308487BE-59A5-4F01-8D64-6DBD9B0FB565@stanleylieber.com> <9EA4B59167BC6F9B36B6EA285140E19F@musolino.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: asynchronous compliant storage polling-based generator Subject: Re: [9front] test new server Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:03:16PM +0000, sirjofri wrote: > 05.01.2021 19:57:41 Kurt H Maier : > > gmail's latest idiocy:� if an MTA does not have an ipv6 address, any > > messages it emits are flagged as spam until users train it otherwise. > > Is this real? Where did you get this information from? Practical experience. For many years gmail would reject ANY message sent over ipv6 as spam, then it would reject if you lacked an ipv6 reverse dns record, and now it rejects unless your server both has an ipv6 PTR record AND is accessible over ipv6. It took some time before it started delivering mail again under these circumstances. khm