From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4738 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2021 10:35:14 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Mar 2021 10:35:14 -0000 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 1ess; Fri Mar 26 01:14:23 -0400 2021 Received: (qmail 34364 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Mar 2021 22:14:14 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:14:14 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: webscale self-healing JSON over HTTP rails extension factory GPU manager Subject: Re: [9front] fossil? Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:31:41AM +0900, kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote: > Recently, fossil was removed from the source tree of /sys/src/cmd. > What do you find defective of it? > Venti is still there... Fossil's removal from 9front is not recent. > I think the historical defeat of fossil was solved by Richard's patch? There have been several claims, over the years, of having fixed fossil. Some of them may even have been true. I don't think 9front should resurrect it; if someone wants to run a fossil server they are probably better off using ANTS or 9legacy or something. khm