From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13600 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2021 08:11:57 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Jun 2021 08:11:57 -0000 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]) by 1ess; Wed Jun 2 11:58:21 -0400 2021 Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:adr@sdf.org [205.166.94.16]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 152FwHNV022798 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:58:17 GMT Received: (from adr@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 152FwG0g019675 for 9front@9front.org; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:58:16 GMT Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:58:16 +0000 From: adr@SDF.ORG To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <2EC535482882B59C4457FB3157D3D742@felloff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2EC535482882B59C4457FB3157D3D742@felloff.net> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: stateless generic JSON over ActivityPub information rails enhancement Subject: Re: [9front] I can't make sdloop(3) work Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:06:24PM +0200, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: > > Was sdloop written for something different I was supposing? > > Now that I know of partfs, what is the common use of sdloop? > Sorry, I thought that the context was sufficient. I mean removable media, with the reader attached to the computer but the storage not necessary present. If I change the sd card, the old partitions are shown as present. This doesn't seams _to_me_ to be a good idea. At least with diskparts now I can refresh them. Also I'm booting from a usb drive but I have to insert a sd card to avoid the annoying messages of emmc errors wich also slow down the boot process. > have you tried omitting the !1024? it should then default to 512 byte sectors. Yes, it was that, thanks. The thing is that with sdloop been part of the sd driver partfs looks _to_me_ redundant, that is why I was asking the difference between them, curiosity of a newcomer. Thanks again, adr.