From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4185 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2021 18:45:35 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Jun 2021 18:45:35 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 1ess; Fri Jun 25 14:09:01 -0400 2021
Received: (qmail 9462 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Jun 2021 11:09:00 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:09:00 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=sciops.net; h=date:from:to
	:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type
	:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=NEG/8O86DA4It2MjS5xQcFWusnI=; b=STF2
	uQTotIFZ29JqdYXCp0uGdMBhij2CcV2TRiNyR+AI8xH3RP0JM83FHc1dCKZdYqfZ
	cylxXeEakVhKg5fP+yMw3MatNJu37Qyy306MimeHzFsz42Q4rU2guehKCVdGMfrr
	ePlesPdXFUBVQae2FxUT+6/ezb8OvCFE/gHtdwc=
Message-ID: <YNYbvBsVRPVsu7Lm@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <73a7277f-ce12-42b8-b3e3-ed86925764ca@sirjofri.de>
 <C9E6B5F8-CF00-4EBC-AA63-641D7ED4627D@stanleylieber.com>
 <CABB-WO8Q+-zBc1viL9_UFMOVFnTFf-_1WXmM2YYcsTE3QTYJBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YNUiPJ8KxsblB0bk@wopr>
 <CABB-WO8A1-rc7DJmOEChzxaxz9sYrYR_gA0JbQoeKXLgg3xRzQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO8A1-rc7DJmOEChzxaxz9sYrYR_gA0JbQoeKXLgg3xRzQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: TOR over JSON framework reduce/map-scale optimizer 
Subject: Re: [9front] Two errors in fqa
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:16:22PM +0100, Stuart Morrow wrote:
> On 25/06/2021, Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
> > What is wrong with people finding the wiki, anyway?
> 
> Nothing is "wrong" with it, but it's called docs when it's really the
> documentation equivalent of /extra.  So it's called docs and linked to
> from the front page when it's really the furthest thing from *the*
> documentation.

I don't think the intention is for that wiki to be /extra-like.  I can't
speak for kvik but I always thought the goal was to be comprehensive.

People complained that the FQA was considered 'the' documentation when
nobody voted for sl, now people are complaining that other efforts are
masquerading as 'the' documentation.  Unless and until the project
develops a watery tart to lob scimitars at people I don't see the
advantage in promoting one best-effort documentation project over
another, even if I happen to prefer one.

khm