From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17729 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2021 18:30:08 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 28 Jun 2021 18:30:08 -0000 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 1ess; Mon Jun 28 14:21:34 -0400 2021 Received: (qmail 98891 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Jun 2021 11:21:32 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:21:32 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=sciops.net; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=Tqyx1Fu8BWq1chmVEvkisbbaER8=; b=dqOb mUGsGFDpI62g6pURu4ZMwBb7QCRth0e/4O1PWChRoGCaSSNeJEiNYDMCQs1KG3Mw chRx9tBJQIa426OVzxQfG2sM/zEJeYIta8oXY7rJOp03n/vtmONa+7sx471unHPr RBLEQwggpZRfhfTLPs0oZVfKATMop2Te9GXnigQ= Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <80b616ff-4480-4ad5-848f-b027383da81c@a-b.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: managed agile proxy information frontend Subject: Re: [9front] Two errors in fqa Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:12:13PM +0200, kvik@a-b.xyz wrote: > > Sorry for the mess. Naming is hard. > None of this is your fault. Expectation-management is a common problem, and it's completely intractable when the expectations to be managed are those of complete strangers wandering past at random. I don't really think it's worth putting a huge amount of effort into, since no matter what you do there will be someone whining, somewhere. khm