From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7471 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2021 00:29:36 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 17 Jul 2021 00:29:36 -0000 Received: from h2.fbrelay.privateemail.com ([131.153.2.43]) by 1ess; Fri Jul 16 20:25:15 -0400 2021 Received: from MTA-09-3.privateemail.com (mta-09-1.privateemail.com [198.54.122.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1.fbrelay.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103AF80F8A for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:11:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mta-09.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta-09.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC3718000A1 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:11:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.20.151.234]) by mta-09.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EDF5B180009F for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:11:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:11:16 -0700 From: Anthony Martin To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: References: <88BD1BEFF383546B927C4C29C64BBC8A@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: flexible core hypervisor Subject: Re: [9front] git/fetch problem in group writable repositories Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Looks good to me too. cinap_lenrek@felloff.net once said: > but why not ORCLOSE? The only reason I didn't suggest ORCLOSE was because I thought it might be useful to have the pack file linger around for debugging a failed fetch. Cheers, Anthony