From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13150 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2021 19:34:57 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Nov 2021 19:34:57 -0000 Received: from mail-oi1-f169.google.com ([209.85.167.169]) by 4ess; Tue Nov 2 15:27:03 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id y11so344477oih.7 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:27:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Izj78SMDl3BXRwa48ZRsqyqenz9Z39JGVg4GIzn0lPw=; b=gMc3UYhO1bdkKve8kFHRl9PX+UG1bSTerkak0LfAY2jxGGJJ6K8TxPmTk3hz0RBelZ 9WLbHt8FA6Zfl4ZHEAqoef68uQoDDrH0v+p7622sjuJZAh8xbhVTVCarbqWRUqNdyCEU Ytrw3EEwEjoUddGjbT3oxJQ+Ez1ncxecytaQ8vXfScpmKqrIIC12WCEY/LsvynefTSZA WhbIYr91DPt5LwUb9WizUAyfEUcTn9qIqW8YhUsyaHXsat4mgup+IqzZZ2/eysr7678o 4KriMcU5+t7csBfFVs8YrHxVCwqIxXjUhCmR64EaC1qWb+MOJTL2VGwkG3vMX54S0XBS Po0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Izj78SMDl3BXRwa48ZRsqyqenz9Z39JGVg4GIzn0lPw=; b=rh1M+6JFIbzmM0VRYnZJ2jR8LDlwSb9kirC0IpHqNgi0X7h8vTh1IV6ox/On/I5dKJ cinaKzhKxcjnHaPu7PcCyFNUACwTrE/8vuD7WITH4QIMOgswkJWIGqIx8YNtp/SjZFO8 dYsQFN3ICdkksSIKjEsjl6EhfAWfQ1HkK6peLNsenvbHiFGXGpDmSeIiKIm0ETH0Z0ye Twipg4rlD71FXwZdHdchoEkv+9Dj6F7OtnsDj4CkjP7oFvEDGvFDjq674LPkGzEgcWhs oTFCp9rxX2CTqcL5ZPKTXS8iz6+uxqSQ/fgPMfZ2vEZkODfaiYGBRxz4mwrbMw1QBnDQ iYzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/7WIpX30lOE6GR0uNPt0Xvp6/dlOerh0CTasghZYph1oi7/Kw y/uTW8ttjBB3Tj4EXsbpD/4nVIQx6qo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzs8vyno8XDNvJClA+cYVkLnGLRO21p/6FNZFzjcKX+RLTPAjk7e4MOULo0lXSuKb7AH3Pqrw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5515:: with SMTP id b21mr9058162pji.239.1635879267565; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from imac.0x30.net (d205-250-121-157.bchsia.telus.net. [205.250.121.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19sm16787090pgk.81.2021.11.02.11.54.26 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:54:25 -0700 From: Kyle Milz To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: References: <4EBE77893E9CE3937BDC099792A210A9@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EBE77893E9CE3937BDC099792A210A9@eigenstate.org> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: webscale reduce/map information rails Subject: Re: [9front] man du -s correction diff Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:57:15PM -0400, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > Quoth Humm : [...] > > > > The top level being each `file` argument, and the values being gotten > > by descending the hierarchy as always. > > > > -- > > Humm > > > > I agree that the current phrasing is a bit confusing. > What about "for each file" => "for each argument"? given no markup this seems much better. however the original manual marks up `file` with .IR, and when viewed with something that displays that markup differently, it is obvious that `file` means the final argument of du, as described in the synopsis.