From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 1685 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2021 01:54:53 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Dec 2021 01:54:53 -0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]) by 4ess; Sat Dec 4 20:19:54 -0500 2021 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id d9so14238615wrw.4 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 17:19:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=GNi5bfnl0S/L8UpEw0Kp4B06kVjnnbtAUMKaJERo/sY=; b=fa9SsHpeoQGXCoJgt/Pt6lht/jdTJL7d9pKJXHoLI0CDLcWYmCiEJz4M5vZIsZlX7L ysxqIoitLtqpxwikR6wv6ax3t4Ba7ccBKpDEZfsM5gP90RRX4XCIiC3N8rnxPle3LRKM m+QpNZcMCzjN1UAuGhY0pRIbDI6Td8mGAsPOmkc1I/uQ9/bh/6mXpEkMmOnCx7vNs7rx aE8RjlJoFRJhDl8vtcV2pCLvt7HIJzMJEfV6nPty4YhpqtxQhSMsMAmR4FcsbYVToSlI sWX5565uI+oZcpqdWsPqXwp/V7lWR1TVCcngZaDywsufwcTyom7gIT0FocPkKPfuXTCK Ve0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=GNi5bfnl0S/L8UpEw0Kp4B06kVjnnbtAUMKaJERo/sY=; b=jg8wcZGsf9OKoR2lDog3qVq5EgqQH8huD7SY4SedbGS9kmuQALaugNZGzuziEr0LXL BiNd8cnUhDk5n1bPwEYPlR9M77fsKVijDerdN66CMD4pjYYg23zGeOarOIB6lr1A2LcR j1MPQRo2inxH4Oh3YjJm4/q3YFgogWhA67c8GWVSoOqJ/bPs/Aibno01KsTqEsD6aUhM ghwYN4BKQABesNIcGGjEM4bjbfrZIieOsPsenLqehD8IGmQS3nS2sfEV05NTO6LnMzkS oUCDkCoJSag0kI5Dm2QY5Xa/SmLbLxuyPUFBP2RK5ZTGi4+Fv+3m/fS8R8/6EuSuk+R7 R+NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iWrGifNpcmqRBtYjieMG92Gdecl+J0I5mUy2rp59XGM1MJhAX eEvPSfN+m1u9t6KIsVVuFDOckkkQuYM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQYlbcClcV2uFGw6H2Y+1ACfznvvnDELvWP+K7sc3sK9Wnnx5OmxQEAqyq6I+WuS+qBzg+HA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f64b:: with SMTP id x11mr32970995wrp.4.1638667160983; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 17:19:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from beryllium.local (dyndsl-095-033-230-048.ewe-ip-backbone.de. [95.33.230.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g19sm9743351wmg.12.2021.12.04.17.19.20 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Dec 2021 17:19:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (beryllium.local [local]) by beryllium.local (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 10e86b0c for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 5 Dec 2021 02:19:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 01:19:17 +0000 From: Humm To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: decentralized shader template descriptor-based DOM frontend Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] troff: we are not htmlroff Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Noam Preil: >Hey, > >htmlroff(6) says to use `.if !h .if t` to check for normal troff. What's >the issue with that approach? It does not work. If `.if h` would work correctly, that would check for normal troff as opposed to both htmlroff and nroff, but as it is, it does not work. Try: ; troff -a .if !h .if t \{\ .de M .tm m ← output m ← output Not what you expect at all: Yes, this is troff, but we should be defining a macro. The `.tm` should not get executed, and there should not be a blank line before its output. -- Humm