From: Anthony Martin <ality@pbrane.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: [9front] recent upas/runq change
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 17:57:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZB+YbtCfhrrn6WyW@alice> (raw)
Doesn't forking without RFNOWAIT interfere with the job handling
mechanism in rundir? The new call to waitpid can consume the
waitmsg from an unrelated proc and return before the send in
returnmail finishes.
I haven't run this new code, only read it. Am I missing something?
Cheers,
Anthony
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-26 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-26 0:57 Anthony Martin [this message]
2023-03-26 2:01 ` ori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZB+YbtCfhrrn6WyW@alice \
--to=ality@pbrane.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).