From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 26022 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2023 23:29:54 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Mar 2023 23:29:54 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Sun Mar 26 19:25:42 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1679873040;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=IEx4HhGSnHvV97Ss9Q85nS+zHKkcpqJGbv4E09m6Qlg=;
	b=DqdaFZMNzPzdzJVj0G4wtzBrw8MXGpaPpWUkqT/Pdc19JknAIeLDqH8k+TonbcUoer2kyi
	hlobq2WemUSXMUUmbJGrawHQFsfHR/jVpx75N54rtPHPjOxZZy0rDwJmYu5V9pSN4pcHHJ
	hiIp0cUX1VxjXiKqfjJSylSUV83+AbQ=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id e08ef16e
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Sun, 26 Mar 2023 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 16:24:00 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZCDUEJ/pt/h3hLk+@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <CAFSF3XOYyPjQGRE4J7motJBjud+A+XW4c_20o6AwjfMfcJ5KEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2DF17A4B-4B82-4A01-90C5-38BE5001A799@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <2DF17A4B-4B82-4A01-90C5-38BE5001A799@gmail.com>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: singleton content-driven realtime-java app-scale generator 
Subject: Re: [9front] removal of /lib/unicode
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 12:42:18PM -0700, Michael Misch wrote:
> I feel like we’re falling well beyond the scope of discourse.

Please provide the rest of us the parameters necessary to determine the
scope of discourse.  I don't want to fall out of compliance again.

Regards,
khm