From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] FQA update
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 13:27:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCiTpOWtrshGpMSD@wopr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0B825421E44F1C59271E3F6E7F150095@gaff.inri.net>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:50:44PM -0400, sl@stanleylieber.com wrote:
> > The fact now the system is installing mainly on amd64 (in the case of
> > virtualization) and on arm (in the case of RPi). Therefore, IMHO,
> > there need to set accent on these architectures, and the rest ones are
> > mention as options.
>
> well, maybe. if we arrive at some agreement on changing the "default"
> architecture, fine; but to my knowledge nobody has established that
> yet. 386 was always the starting point. i appreciate that owners of
> amd64 systems often have no interest in looking back, but we do still
> have a significant number of 386 users, and the amd64 port in fact
> still builds code out of the 386 kernel. a significant number of drivers
> are still disabled (by default)in the amd64 kernel.
>
> i am of course happy to revisit this if devs have some preference
> to the contrary.
In addition the raspberry pi is a trash computer and I'm not comfortable
recommending them even implicitly by emphasising them in documentation.
People should try really hard not to use them even when they ARE
available, which is not any more.
khm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-01 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 5:37 Yury Chumak
2023-03-17 19:52 ` Tobias Heinicke
2023-03-18 3:37 ` sl
2023-03-29 3:32 ` sl
2023-03-29 11:09 ` Yury Chumak
2023-03-31 18:50 ` sl
2023-04-01 20:27 ` Kurt H Maier [this message]
2023-04-01 20:52 ` Steve Simon
2023-04-01 21:29 ` ori
2023-04-02 7:10 ` Kurt H Maier
2023-04-02 9:40 ` ooga
2023-04-02 11:29 ` Philip Silva
2023-04-02 14:49 ` Stanley Lieber
2023-04-02 17:54 ` Philip Silva
2023-04-02 18:03 ` Philip Silva
2023-04-02 19:21 ` hiro
2023-04-06 14:11 ` cinap_lenrek
2023-04-06 14:19 ` cinap_lenrek
2023-04-06 16:04 ` Stanley Lieber
2023-04-02 19:59 ` Kurt H Maier
2023-04-03 10:22 ` chris
2023-04-03 11:50 ` chris
2023-04-03 18:09 ` adventures in9
2023-04-03 19:13 ` Stanley Lieber
2023-04-03 21:44 ` sirjofri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCiTpOWtrshGpMSD@wopr \
--to=khm@sciops.net \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).