From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 18803 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:24:11 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:24:11 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:18:54 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1698117490;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=nPefnh3JGBQ1iyza/JmJb/B8lP0kcqe5kMIaOxb+ulI=;
	b=iKMbXiHWjIT+uFekEFkkbRfOOXFPrUIKLYf/88+4exRG2mp9i4T5aJtviZx887d7oCokCG
	aFBXJA7DXHsD1XwY2yoQWlmTGZkGDLp10NdrHFnm+DdV6ZIDdLza6EArCxC7KZELIZYXtE
	9DXxTG13gdZOt9X26pfS/ygubH+uAFo=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 78d6a88c
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:18:10 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZTc3cq9kJeZMOt9z@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid>
 <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com>
 <fdc8de2c-0bd5-4604-81b4-918b6d6ff57f@invalid.invalid>
 <ZTcuCeLqAxbIw0x4@wopr>
 <e894585d-540a-4078-b0fc-fbc98ab0fefb@invalid.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e894585d-540a-4078-b0fc-fbc98ab0fefb@invalid.invalid>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: transactional basic template singleton polling enhancement 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:00:33PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
> Okay:  it prevents batteries from being recognized as existing.  Works that
> for you?

No.  Include a link to sysinfo output from the affected machine.

> I seen't what info'd be necessary.  Please clarify.

Your English is as bad as your problem-solving capacity.

> That accusation of theft seems to me completely out of left field. Where on
> earth did you get it from?

If only more people would ask you questions like that; whoever
orignially bought that computer might still have it.

khm