From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 18963 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:29:30 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:29:30 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:24:09 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1698117808;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=7QhhaO4yVcbhQokicOWSFzyGxkT18SqqEI4dbZJTJkQ=;
	b=MuP0hNXGnUsl/V9XjWeKaXdLyGs6onDI+KyZlK6pvJA6LBCElsYLJ/sjYkDrlwAEFr0HsR
	VS+VKD/VVSV/xjDw5cgErE8MqwUpDKWLNulx5fmu8EQ6rzKGt9utX4O4MrRXchDRnuIWnq
	k7w75mNpFjJBqyd9+N+APheOF1KzRFE=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ce982d50
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:23:28 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZTc4sCI20LzwOkvM@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid>
 <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com>
 <fdc8de2c-0bd5-4604-81b4-918b6d6ff57f@invalid.invalid>
 <ZTcuCeLqAxbIw0x4@wopr>
 <204c915c-f33e-16aa-cc81-e692860619b2@umbrellix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <204c915c-f33e-16aa-cc81-e692860619b2@umbrellix.net>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: callback base-based optimizer 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:16:53AM +0000, Ellenor Bjornsdottir wrote:
> "(likely stolen)"
> 
> Kurt: Is that really where we're going? I'll have you know that that may
> qualify as libel if false.

Key words:  "if false."  Are you claiming to have knowledge of this
possible crime, or do you merely defend potential criminals as a hobby?
If someone is stealing laptops, and someone knows something about it,
but chooses to defend the thief, that person might be an accessory to
the crime.  

> Hawk: get a lawyer. In the meantime, what model of laptop do you have? This
> is important if you want anyone to help you get a battery readout.

A lawyer might get a thief out of their just punishment, but that won't
restore the stolen property to its rightful owner.  A sysinfo readout
would be more useful, here, than a lawyer.  Preferably a serial number
as well, so we can check with the police to see if it's been reported
stolen.

khm