From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 19691 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:45:47 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:45:47 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:38:08 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1698118647;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=xkS7mwi4rw/3JTtY8wCLxNOO1IOYjCaEieg9/tm+IZM=;
	b=jd/7wf7wG8MKvvwMaHk+Ds0dQ98b2Z/6CJHnYqj1//MWLxrm2C0+DiFwlIkpDDVHTLfxXm
	TrpLBzV2PPJTpXbrofF6QZo1N+BqO5XK5nj6QLwa2nGvEAlnvOHbjUKo4lqFPc7Owk7JaQ
	XGdNLwiE/LPPxD1Kh8eQiA09bkZIuAo=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 75d7eb6d
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:37:27 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZTc792pHN44lQ8jz@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid>
 <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com>
 <fdc8de2c-0bd5-4604-81b4-918b6d6ff57f@invalid.invalid>
 <ZTcuCeLqAxbIw0x4@wopr>
 <e894585d-540a-4078-b0fc-fbc98ab0fefb@invalid.invalid>
 <ZTc3cq9kJeZMOt9z@wopr>
 <553d4b18-df20-45d6-b8ce-b9bd4f6b4320@invalid.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <553d4b18-df20-45d6-b8ce-b9bd4f6b4320@invalid.invalid>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: secure app-oriented software core framework 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:32:20PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
> > I seen't how that justifies of the problem itself caring, of which to
> which your statement in reference to was.

You're an idiot, then.  If your machine is worth supporting, people will
care.  Sysinfo output is the easiest way to make that determination.
Once again, you're not qualified to identify which information is
relevant.

> If you, as an english speaker, can parse that sentence, it is a valid
> english sentence.  Back on topic, that does not clarify.

Plenty of valid English sentences are shit.  Most of yours have been.

> Ah, i see what you're trying to do there now.  You're not going to succeed
> in it.

I strongly recommend you return any stolen property as quickly as
possible.  

khm