From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 11577 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 00:41:52 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 00:41:52 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 20:38:50 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1698107884;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Ge99u5KBDBMrk53Z1+4/ytGEvyNrrNRdAI59/X3jKBs=;
	b=BfRNGJHx2dYLhnE0ozCK+mdFS+AWb48ojNAipSaoOl7qdF6NqcBadyNfWaLNJH/b+418kY
	7bP6BrDgR8lmr3YRG/ZyASaNq+CTuXKGtpd08DsRWt9NLi959yPguBHR6XE2e2nu4uOczw
	FBvrjumB4IlKxPqIjEoLrdylPsAc9io=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id de8f9a09
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:38:04 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZTcR7PJb13Xs3fpE@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <5f50281a-73d8-470f-b629-b691068f10b2@invalid.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5f50281a-73d8-470f-b629-b691068f10b2@invalid.invalid>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: lossless SQL over HTTP markup core-scale control 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 05:05:57PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
> Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86.

Good.

khm