From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 17255 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 02:45:35 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 02:45:35 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 22:38:43 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1698115081;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Ri6z2Carxc/mc/X3B2yH/laH9nDfsAaMn0m+DsjA3/U=;
	b=fdHubMZO07ZGlefhFydjy9u/zHcdz+62e2MQZW2QWAlKLalSmoyfynKqpPFbaC/dAODWeN
	/mhkJ9hkqWIEVB3a2kgpfbrIe1KB3mLppOhA9ucc8/20hnRhw9uHhgRfczVxj1FLk1U0QB
	XZoVMKqvw3BipSVLFnVIGYHG3MS57O4=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 02b9d4dc
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:38:01 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZTcuCeLqAxbIw0x4@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid>
 <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com>
 <fdc8de2c-0bd5-4604-81b4-918b6d6ff57f@invalid.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <fdc8de2c-0bd5-4604-81b4-918b6d6ff57f@invalid.invalid>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: hypervisor reduce/map GPU table-based layer 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 09:18:52PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
> I made no insistence that it “should be obvious”.  Contrary to your claim of
> loweffortness, I _did_ make an effort, that being to include only the needed
> information.

You forgot to include any information supporting the implicit assumption
that people on this mailing list should give a shit that libaml does not
recognize opcode 0x86.  You have still failed to include any information
which would enable someone, in the event they unilaterally decided to
give a shit anyway, to do anything useful with the information you have
so inexpertly provided.

In other words, you are not qualified to ascertain what information is
needed, and you did it wrong.  For this, and many other reasons, I am
glad you can't get a battery readout on your (likely stolen) computer.

khm