From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23923 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 05:25:49 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 05:25:49 -0000 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Tue Oct 24 01:10:37 -0400 2023 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706; t=1698124195; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W0Vw04xXQ3ZcZ0cMxEFTdxwg/WPkw8Ot15bZI0e43oE=; b=iEJDk4+Z49NgBaT2mNpPG1/t+4pDlKM5sOnuNXVRkqRZcgLSfQ2cB6z2vBdJAOtJ1SspDA YTIvNHRBffAlVAVMQRlPfO1nn+PFjFfxzOZ7vdAHcD/5Jh7ZhvuItR0Xoo5r7aHG/tYzeG DvcQqHZferjBPvRu7ZjpqxL7FE+M/TQ= Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local]) by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 5c8f81a0 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:09:55 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid> <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> <204c915c-f33e-16aa-cc81-e692860619b2@umbrellix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: blockchain information app information database Subject: Re: [9front] Tonight on Top Gear. ACPI problems, me learning a thing, and accusations of theft Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:03:17AM +0000, Ellenor Bjornsdottir wrote: > And that's the third direct accusation of theft? Kurt? Bruh. Lay off it. "If > false" was merely stating that libel law in the US excludes truthful libel > (as it should). Lay off of what? JUSTICE? That won't ever happen. And there's no such thing as "truthful libel," which would be an oxymoron. I'm starting to think you're not even a lawyer, or possibly you haven't been admitted to the bar! I don't think anyone should take your legal advice until you've established your credentials. If you even have them. khm