From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE8221627
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2024 04:21:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Sat Apr  6 22:18:27 -0400 2024
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1712456294;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=UweGWRl+FJysyI4TPuhpMlC5zshZybjqg9mkWZNfmP0=;
	b=gqgF6RgBN+xzqvOX1l4n2Y2S4I1jZpyWqNCipimF9+Q4fYOxBWBcNLmhxpnvpNOJFcQlJE
	zXXuCwdjYqp39u7P33ywgkBOr12rJeqBMjuVrB5Yqh5h93VOZirHygB6igyCL3/x6G7PAP
	rfLNtwpyd2sXISIBzUR9tA521lPaLNk=
Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local])
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id e5995d6e
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:18:14 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <ZhICZuuNfpq2wZBh@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <37_SdgKfn22mapMSQ9N0vLD2I5xEwg8PlsWufRcP6RmucjZLxvGsf2Wjo4UmOvgaSh3HpJh8HAvfhSMSGwdNnoqofOqtd7EGZk6PyO0MPcY=@protonmail.com>
 <ZhGUnU9rixeFfzu8@wopr>
 <5f0b93d67d15366f@orthanc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5f0b93d67d15366f@orthanc.ca>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: stable open-source descriptor API SOAP core scripting singleton content-driven interface 
Subject: Re: [9front] Expired SSL certificate
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 05:41:16PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote:
> Kurt H Maier writes:
> 
> > it'll probably stay that way.  it doesn't really hurt anything.  if
> > someone has a compelling reason I'm open to putting a new cert in, but I
> > don't really see the point at the moment. traffic remains encrypted.
> 
> But it will scare away non-Plan 9 users browsing the code with
> a web browser.  That's a bit anti-social.
> 
> --lyndon

More or less antisocial than just taking the server down?

Feel free to take whatever code you need to socialize and host it
elsewhere.

khm