From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BC7287AA for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 21:05:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Fri Aug 9 15:04:33 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706; t=1723230269; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7eL3O/bqY8UyTg9rMu6Ks2uMIWDmqlz+B7cdx/jtw6E=; b=y7gDTnrSCf2nWPyIyQHt1gQpmfeo33c6z8CA8iqF0qwOBzKZhgA85kgvTxDK9BG+pldK2W 7PM+fLAffHE8ZhdlzswH0zrtT/21ArLm9KHc8gxQ3Qaf52N6RCS9BCHLpvpy2f8uozERmJ p4VACBbCqjezCz7iW6Y071s8D92N6R4= Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local]) by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a248c4fa for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:04:29 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: stateless persistence-oriented ACPI full-stack DOM-oriented solution Subject: Re: [9front] zynq Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:53:19AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > is anybody still running on the zynq? I might have the right one lying > around. I still use it on my aijuboard now and then. I can lend it to you if you want something to compare to. khm