From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E8C26882
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2024 22:09:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by 9front; Sun Aug  4 16:08:45 -0400 2024
Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WcVy35slYzDq6c
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2024 20:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
	t=1722802123; bh=+FOko7wvDmDzVPLml20NovgpSp6OaOILWurgVzk1oJM=;
	h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From;
	b=KpxbD1mQRiJM/ll8bYJYJPQUnaOhNvsBiCug//Mo/GDbV+xtWo+xRwluPiRJj/oM0
	 FixXFYFoy42wO4fz0WTl0zHUVzAsBCFETpP62lXHnEJTf7Ip2NtvI1u3BXJE3YFxRk
	 Q/C3HauVUyhKxf2MUUh09S+BVjGy5Tu/DNe4+zGY=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 041FF8313F10F82953D3A565BDB5F1A0E8B61C95E87C7F94EBF407F29C78F101
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	 by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WcVy21bFvzFt8c
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2024 20:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 00:38:29 +0430 (GMT+04:30)
From: mkf9 <mkf9@riseup.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <a2bdbb8e-8c49-4dcf-a450-8599b9d0551e@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHwi9bz8+5xineQkYRHdpWk8sawYN8D=pbCOBYxJst3FxZWUug@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d7b9eadd-c2b5-444a-821b-c72991ef532f@howhill.com> <CABB-WO_V84+BcDref07CGrb8iqKJZpTW-YdYMhyvMVH2WQ3F-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHwi9bz8+5xineQkYRHdpWk8sawYN8D=pbCOBYxJst3FxZWUug@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Correlation-ID: <a2bdbb8e-8c49-4dcf-a450-8599b9d0551e@riseup.net>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: session package just-in-time rails-scale control 
Subject: Re: [9front] Thoughts on Wayland?
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

mcf had one called wl9,

I think.

Aug 5, 2024 12:25:13 AM Eli Cohen <echoline@gmail.com>:

> always better to be a willow that bends than the strongest oak in a=20
> storm :)
>
> there's a common misconception that plan 9 is an OS for a computer.=20
> plan 9
> is an OS for a network. drawing fast locally is not a plan 9 concept.=20
> plan
> 9 is a 9P multiplexer. a wayland shim for linux/mac/bsd/etc that=20
> renders to
> draw somewhere else on the network would be good and appreciated and a
> relevant plan 9 concept and people are working on it... but for a fast
> local wayland implementation, that's what linux is, and linux can be=20
> and is
> a part of plan 9 which is an OS for a network
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2024, 12:46=E2=80=AFPM Stuart Morrow <morrow.stuart@gmail.=
com>=20
> wrote:
>
>> How do you share memory over rcpu?
>>