From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SUBJ_LACKS_WORDS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05BF22333 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 19:49:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Sat Oct 5 13:46:55 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1728150384; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6IH0wBX4NwyLYjYJ6q5RsudoNxM5Ms72jjPIoTsL2Us=; b=crELVsp2wZNWQGKvGAPKsYNOQ6VuD9Aho/exnGtwoJoKyBqt3Hyu2RgIqM2+NlB5aT75Tz 50OOcTpHrDGwUVHQeWjNvcD7rhj9xJw5qfgEjsEZzbggPw2ODIKI508BhsZKWTRo7pYkKX 8uQd/VUMJghixr4n044z2OOUhKaGim4= Received: from [192.168.168.200] (173-22-56-200.client.mchsi.com [173.22.56.200]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6922a906 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:46:23 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:46:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: mobile responsive persistence callback-oriented rich-client descriptor Subject: Re: [9front] 9pfs Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 10/5/24 11:26, william@thinktankworkspaces.com wrote: > Oh I see. I do have a 9front server running. This is my first exeriment with 9pfs. I just wanted to > throw 9pfs on a Mac and a few linux boxes. I guess I just wanted to connect without the hassel of > ssh or sshfs. But it does sound like I need a few more tools to really get the benefit out of it > beyond 9pfs, meaning that I suppose I need plan9ports installed and factotum and a few other things or is > that incorrect. Strange enough but I'm kind of getting attached to acme editor and have been using it > in my daily life with sshfs and changing code on remote servers. It's light weight as opposed to vscode > or intellij running remotely which is heavy. I loose some benefits but I gain others. > > So I thought to kind of expand with 9pfs and take advantage of some additional features. > Hold on here, it's still not clear exactly what the end result is that you're looking for here. Let's start from the top here: 9pfs does not require anything from plan9port. 9pfs is a fuse 9p client. 9pfs connects to a system that is running a 9p file server (over port 564 by default). This means your mac is initiating a network connection to your 9front machine, so the 9front machine must be listening for 9p. Ssh and sshfs go the other way, they initiate a network connection from 9front to a machine running ssh. 9pfs would expose the 9front's files to your mac, sshfs exposes your macs files to your 9front. A 9front machine does not expose its root filesystem over 9p by default, that requires some modifications. This is why I was asking about the networking status of your 9front machine (ie can you ping it, is it listening on port 564 etc) Hope this helps, moody