From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.229.218.5 with SMTP id ho5csp174406qcb; Tue, 1 May 2012 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhCsjYD9BBoEZ3Ixog@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhCsjYD9BBoEZ3Ixog@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.30.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.30.40; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhCsjYD9BBoEZ3Ixog@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.30.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhCsjYD9BBoEZ3Ixog@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhCsjYD9BBoEZ3Ixog@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.30.40]) by 10.52.30.40 with SMTP id p8mr4938975vdh.15.1335887532221 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 01 May 2012 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=InwMvktm6VOZVm7n/wxGAg6hIECLYUynjlFdZAYWGt0=; b=6V8mztWWbLfS9uldKkUhJjwJlbDnDYNE91Qdjl3Wfivx6HNZaeumgFJiuCAO+w7m0K o9I3t5VzLekaAZ/fuKP9UJPKWGfsoAjzC4pmks7aIBnQ72m8dqeAxiSMT/vhucW0Ojnk 1IoVqGGfBrmTagFhOXYY0hVsb/9M+Gh440r4o= Received: by 10.52.30.40 with SMTP id p8mr484719vdh.15.1335887532168; Tue, 01 May 2012 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.222.200 with SMTP id ih8ls2314395vcb.5.gmail; Tue, 01 May 2012 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.23.146 with SMTP id m18mr39833775vdf.7.1335887531777; Tue, 01 May 2012 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.23.146 with SMTP id m18mr39833774vdf.7.1335887531769; Tue, 01 May 2012 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sp.nv ([68.179.132.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cb10si9971228vdb.2.2012.05.01.08.52.11; Tue, 01 May 2012 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.179.132.47 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of sl@9front.org) client-ip=68.179.132.47; Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:52:09 +0000 From: sl@9front.org To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: rep Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0efb06a57a9215d8585e2b9c255e02d9@quintile.net> References: <0efb06a57a9215d8585e2b9c255e02d9@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: sl@9front.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.179.132.47 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of sl@9front.org) smtp.mail=sl@9front.org Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> Is there a simple way to verify whether or not apm is functioning >> besides the line that appears in kmesg? > > logprog 'test -e ''#P/apm'' && echo APM supported' logprog cat /mnt/apm/ctl for greater detail? (See cinap's message.) An error if the file doesn't exist should be fine. -sl