From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 12678 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2022 18:24:28 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jun 2022 18:24:28 -0000
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by 9front; Thu Jun  2 14:22:15 -0400 2022
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
	by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LDZ9V1q9mzDsYJ
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2022 18:22:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
	t=1654194126; bh=bqZfd/z2+BYLvXxjgLj24Sf++3vXCyk/OWDxge8pJu8=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=ehica+gwptYUSLU4Ea6vwqSJKuNOQSDzYllFtWidtg0yb60u0xPT8pgsMC/enQFXu
	 AzFeZnFV36yekm+O98AeoB0upL05WdDJOxr48TP5hMPm7vMnzw4OWsAAET1s8bQZ/0
	 DmqzxfkttXqgKkeeP7DTsIZ1l+CoEE2v6YkL7iP0=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 3A35426D9E73E1215AC71E4DDF36E93935AACA10BB31D28D6AE3D91003D9E4CF
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	 by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LDZ9S4M5jz5vRK
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2022 18:22:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <731daab7-296e-0afb-92ca-fa09da9ce410@posixcafe.org>
 <b34ca8d6-1a3b-d63e-0b9f-e1de2044617f@riseup.net>
 <59969514-082b-4373-6134-71026b443362@posixcafe.org>
From: mkf9 <mkf9@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <ae83c1cc-72a4-0c7b-c8d3-8397881454a1@riseup.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 22:51:49 +0430
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59969514-082b-4373-6134-71026b443362@posixcafe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: browser content-driven HTTP over HTTP package cache 
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] remove misleading BUGS from auth(8)
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Jacob Moody wrote:
>> do different $services use different kernels in 9front
>> or it's a legacy of bell labs?
>>
> 
> In 9front its all one kernel with different code paths depending on $service.
>   From my understanding of the code this is mostly to set resource defaults,
> and different init scripts (/bin/termrc vs /bin/cpurc).
> If my history serves me correct they did used to actually be different
> builds. The wording here does give away how old this "bug" is. In any
> case, this section of the man page only serves to further confuse things.
> I've committed the change.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> moody
> 

I see, thank you.