On Sat, 6 May 2017, Bruce Ellis wrote:

> Now you are just putting words in my (and Cinaps's) mouths.

I am just trying to guess what your cryptic messages are supposed to
mean.

If this whole thing is just an attempt at trolling, kudos to you, you
have me thoroughly pissed off.

I'm well familiar with Golang io, thank you very much.

Please just let us build 9front in peace.
Don't forget your Golang hat on the way out.

> 
> brucee
> 
> On 6 May 2017 at 03:59, Julius Schmidt <aiju@phicode.de> wrote:
> 
>
>       On Sat, 6 May 2017, Bruce Ellis wrote:
>
>             Looks like an interesting project and I wouldn't be surprised if Rob and Co. aren't at least considering what comes after Plan9. Something will.
>             I was never suggesting such a solution.
>
>             I should have perhaps begun with something along the lines of ...
>
>             I consider that changing bio to meet a specific need and adding flags to enable the new functionality is not a very forward looking solution.
> 
>
>       Translation: Don't touch the artwork. Wait for rob to create next artwork instead. Preferably in Golang.
>
>       Flags to fix buffering are an ugly hack but the only better solution I can think of asynchronous buffering, which is impossible to implement in Plan 9, at least transparently.
>
>       You also misunderstood the purpose of the bio fix. It's not just for buffering, it's an attempt to make bio more generally applicable.
>
>             Have fun guys and ask Cinap what it was like to work and fool around in Australia.
> 
>
>       If it was anything like this thread, I pity him already.
> 
>
>             brucee
>
>             On 5 May 2017 at 23:25, Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com> wrote:
>                   On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>                   >
>                   > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>                   >
>                   > sl
>                   >
>
>                   I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
>                   farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
>                   6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
>                   deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
>                   useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
>                   contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
>                   and designed) code.
>
>                   I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>
>                   - Dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>