From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 21611 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2021 01:51:25 -0000
Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Oct 2021 01:51:25 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from smtp.vivaldi.net ([31.209.137.12]) by 4ess; Thu Sep 30 21:45:10 -0400 2021
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.vivaldi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB64BD01C
	for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:05:42 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.vivaldi.net 1AB64BD01C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vivaldi.net;
	s=default; t=1633014342;
	bh=U/7q0BY82bjEZlBGsn2ctE1FBUqddffBwJWFT5em2fE=;
	h=Date:To:From:Subject:From;
	b=ILiUbAju3HDtVd7xj9WxjPcjqD40lvc87Wt1n+hLKSGdMlTvWZzAGu16M65zEB4LR
	 mWJwDu9btSefvn2SVIp8xLhQZbY/74BLwJcQlhdCE37JkcjE1B6tSrU2YWG2FXybMC
	 0dpvqzEfFtyRLz5jz61beFvETguGMRpmcZLvvM/ktCOnmNf7U52UM2j7EPSzrlR1I2
	 7o4wdUzjAtA5HeOiIvMdNvM/FNQZCqT/GhcksUVWymkoKfnFkO4fzhuqNazj/6tTYp
	 6+OqM/vtAdM05zEM1kQl1c5CnTnJmoUH/i6LmMFT8aGtz630yVvkQESQklWtCqXbEI
	 UoT8up9VwqTEg==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp.vivaldi.net
Received: from smtp.vivaldi.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mxo.viv.dc01 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id pmwVuJ4CxUJb for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:05:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <b1663f57-0ef3-b043-c336-6ddac79a6160@vivaldi.net>
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.vivaldi.net 04A30BD035
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vivaldi.net;
	s=default; t=1633014336;
	bh=U/7q0BY82bjEZlBGsn2ctE1FBUqddffBwJWFT5em2fE=;
	h=Date:To:From:Subject:From;
	b=q+rZo0w7uCtnylsX0UQRl+McJPIwYVNo+tW0Usc7IIAhSKxJLeSTNvfor5rWYsehM
	 biSsk5UNkk5qwBxtrZvYEPj4hCAbQRmFWgA7BrBQ54xM+qvwY9kqYjo9S9O8NKrdmp
	 Cz6nJ+X2B4Xb5qtZlJJh3jy7sU3V+iwsWDOio2hi73Sh2hjV8V+fRnQeXlspE6RNFf
	 MAm9PBG224u1X+NM8HpoK85uU0n5JIScVW08p/igwMQPiXEl8DYb16uBiAnDR0wPYL
	 ZMMm8JHW7MSujKQF53OCNZ3TskMC3fWsGa6Ewg1KZdDJnBM7rj2FJ+YaA9p54vEgZH
	 fZzJ4/uwXZdiQ==
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:05:33 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.1.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: 9front@9front.org
From: lyndsay <lyndsay@vivaldi.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: managed converged high-performance-based backend 
Subject: [9front] quick tmdate question
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

can't find a clear answer in tmdate(2)=C2=A0 - i'm writing a program (in =
c)=20
that needs a way to store and parse any arbitrary time AD. will those be=20
properly dealt with if i store times in Tm and parse user input with=20
tmparse() or should i write my own function?

-lyndsay