From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 30536 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2022 16:31:20 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jun 2022 16:31:20 -0000 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by 9front; Thu Jun 2 12:28:32 -0400 2022 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LDWfN1LXxzDr4J for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:28:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1654187308; bh=C1Vt3AWWhEZ8BuwNPASf+HJAwyE25ruCECgT9OAfPLU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Svbk9RMwCWhfo6wPXlZ3deSmoweEwUnbMuKDWH0N2MIJiIophcvLor661JbrbIke2 he3Kg4GX8y7W3ViO7c3UI5tyNkXIKvcbTDOIEquEsbfECHwsk9naxZyLCz3V67rdjm JPMCzlFfSGKHbcm4tH0Sl5b2DoTGV3M0UEM0zcqc= X-Riseup-User-ID: 9948ADEF2ECCA5329AB2F30FE7D3427FBCF806D04313BD7E51B0C23F2D49B3A5 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LDWfM0Zxsz5vhH for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:28:26 +0000 (UTC) To: 9front@9front.org References: <731daab7-296e-0afb-92ca-fa09da9ce410@posixcafe.org> From: mkf9 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 20:58:11 +0430 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <731daab7-296e-0afb-92ca-fa09da9ce410@posixcafe.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: open-source leveraged table hypervisor wrapper Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] remove misleading BUGS from auth(8) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Jacob Moody wrote: > I believe this "bug" is no longer accurate, seems like you > can change userid to none even on a terminal. I also would > expect a terminal to permit changing to any userid that is > present in the hostowner factotum, but wanted to double > check in case I am missing something. do different $services use different kernels in 9front or it's a legacy of bell labs?