From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, NICE_REPLY_A,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23845 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2022 15:34:05 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jun 2022 15:34:05 -0000 Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Mon Jun 6 11:32:37 -0400 2022 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1654529553; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QDllY0ZrTqgjEYU95HRM82+jJgbAqf6zs1PqzbHBYIU=; b=QPv7scZyLRq6Geh75RQ3AASjFypGPET8DK69jhOMRK5ldXm6OmNcLquXyOTTXHwb7GiUiz Va6MIhQRZMo2Qx93W4UBnY5lmzcn5ZYi/XgLCcfYZbvskE+JLJzUT77U8zoQgN3/0rOT5T boGcTWS0WhqtP1O0Uz+RUd9jmHCB5E0= Received: from [192.168.168.200] (161-97-228-135.lpcnextlight.net [161.97.228.135]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6da45ce4 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:32:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:31:59 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: ACPI standard persistence app service-aware generator Subject: Re: [9front] Pitch for devskel Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 6/6/22 09:24, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > Quoth Jacob Moody : >> >> You _can_ just bind things in to your namespace, >> and if you did you just wouldn't need auth/box. >> The point of auth/box is take potentially deeply >> nested/relative paths and to mimic that hierarchy >> the the new root. Due to the restriction of devskel >> to only permit one skeleton per attach. Mimicking some >> hierarchies can be tedious. This removes that tedium. > > I'm not disagreeing with that; I'm wondering if we can > drop the device munging part of it, and instead fix > references to '#'-devs throughout the tree. > Yeah I perfectly content just blocking all devices unless explicitly stated otherwise(through -e flag). And yeah, there likely will need to be some code that directly references devices through '#' in the tree that we need to clean up. I will clean up the device inference parts of this code and rework how mount permissions are specified. Thanks, Moody