From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 7237 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2022 15:28:30 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Jun 2022 15:28:30 -0000
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by 9front; Sat Jun  4 11:26:13 -0400 2022
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
	by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LFk9X718JzDqlG
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sat,  4 Jun 2022 15:26:08 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
	t=1654356369; bh=5KDxKyV7hlm7U4SaQ+rH6Ox1dZ/NGSD1z19EWOdTcjc=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=EAwXGwFExI3DHsnl5JtXZhqkZxNgLMB5Khr8z9iptQk4yrkDR9qOwmJTV9Y9P8HPX
	 PlfeSbH0jDXvassbWTGMSWEV7eyS7lAS7HoozERXoGESlVayadfQqNUhDw4fxAJIT9
	 fSNIF3RV5LO3wX0bJtA9cJhQ8M4+U9N/BAFAuEgc=
X-Riseup-User-ID: CE3CA6B970C8719387804BEF814866D5F1B114CC6BD8EC573DF9B7F54EB5A340
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	 by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LFk9X1mbfz5xhv
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sat,  4 Jun 2022 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <8DCF165E26E87FA681256EFA7DDFDE8E@eigenstate.org>
From: mkf9 <mkf9@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <bd381d96-cd30-00f9-6812-1259ae6263cc@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:56:03 +0430
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8DCF165E26E87FA681256EFA7DDFDE8E@eigenstate.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: flexible managed persistence app 
Subject: Re: [9front] obsolete cryptographic algorithms
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

> it may be better to kill secstore entirely.
> 

do we have alternatives for secstore,
besides auth/aescbc -d < pass > /mnt/factotum/ctl?