From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mta01.eonet.ne.jp ([203.140.81.46]) by pp; Tue Jan  6 23:06:21 EST 2015
Received: from mars.jitaku.localdomain (182-167-142-249f1.osk3.eonet.ne.jp [182.167.142.249])
	by mailmsa11.mozu.eo.k-opti.ad.jp  with ESMTP id t0746E7d017064
	for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 13:06:14 +0900
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject:  Re: [9front] booting time for pc64 kernel
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 13:06:05 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
Message-ID: <ce288be38fdd08c0a21784724a00369c@mars.jitaku.localdomain>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: virtualized package property XML markup property framework
In-Reply-To: <f02e0a95bde9caa39d9bd3bb69d8d240@felloff.net>
References: <f02e0a95bde9caa39d9bd3bb69d8d240@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> this is too unspecific to answer. it could be as simple as the kernel
> file size to complicated as cache misses...
> 
> what times are we talking about? seconds? minutes?

Sorry, my question was the delay time after pc64 kernel booting,
such as after 
init: starting /bin/rc,
or
after the initial vga display and before rio start.
After rio start, there is no such delay.

Kenji