From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	NICE_REPLY_A,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 32432 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2022 16:03:23 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Aug 2022 16:03:23 -0000
Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Thu Aug 18 12:01:58 -0400 2022
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org;
	s=20200506; t=1660838514;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=9oW/QBMN96SpI1ap/gMiUK7AZUoZwS4iM1XIkTNBaC4=;
	b=u41y+2MqtSY/HVOvq6RvYAkBA8Tw4IJ+sFi9urcu2s0QK5+AtAWEpuS+UUl/q0Pi4VSaJ4
	VClWpboc800oZazCzt6F07HggyKPi6i7R3RY+JFfrq4iuo4KaaAOam9OtQXsKNlfg4iTkC
	ppUZoYcahndTOfgGqwKLBOQEO+dfbms=
Received: from [192.168.168.200] (161-97-228-135.mynextlight.net [161.97.228.135])
	by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d036742c (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:01:54 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <d30143c7-4e5e-f7fc-4572-d6217398fea9@posixcafe.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:59:40 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <9BAA91F5C6FAC6721688D0F7710FB552@eigenstate.org>
 <59E49EBC-5853-4BBD-A67D-EB772CE0ECAE@stanleylieber.com>
From: Jacob Moody <moody@mail.posixcafe.org>
In-Reply-To: <59E49EBC-5853-4BBD-A67D-EB772CE0ECAE@stanleylieber.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: framework JSON session software polling control 
Subject: Re: [9front] dangerous Exit menu item in sub-rio
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/18/22 07:59, Stanley Lieber wrote:
> what if the gray background is completely covered up?
> 
> maybe exit could imitate delete and just require a second click (but this time, click anywhere and the current rio dies). we don’t have to call it a confirmation, we can pretend we’re a hunter targeting our prey. we could even borrow the skull and crossbones icon from mothra. maybe this would disturb the cognitive load just enough to be effective?
> 
> sl

This is exactly how it works now, following the latest commit made this morning.

Thanks,

moody