From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.50.47 with SMTP id y35csp214684yhb; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.114.169 with SMTP id c29mr22224810yhh.37.1336450400094; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDfuqL9BBoEmqwp6A@googlegroups.com> Received: from mail-yw0-f56.google.com (mail-yw0-f56.google.com [209.85.213.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d67si16261577yhh.89.2012.05.07.21.13.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 May 2012 21:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDfuqL9BBoEmqwp6A@googlegroups.com designates 209.85.213.56 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.56; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDfuqL9BBoEmqwp6A@googlegroups.com designates 209.85.213.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDfuqL9BBoEmqwp6A@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=@googlegroups.com Received: by yhjj63 with SMTP id j63sf1266512yhj.21 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:13:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=C5nWOdleiuPS4IcbnK4/oQeD358q2Cs9lILE7Z6dtuI=; b=s4CGKXdcl1odTDHccz9Zm4ti7Br5bnLXFhpm/rjd+OyKc1qNnsIkvPl3MJOQaYbY9S WLHcNo6X9n10FGOY+4zS3bTUd57VBx7nJy+7ECvjaksMRGgXoOg8QjiCoxNOYsm5OyWr kANUFz0HgGrHWQ3kLPB14L4NNeG2GODgEAoSQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=C5nWOdleiuPS4IcbnK4/oQeD358q2Cs9lILE7Z6dtuI=; b=aALDqDRj9fXOG2yXkPmiYMZwOoX7sKyAmDM5ZE/nr+QUTOaclKQ94OyLvNbbejfuZb PLpxnTESj+1Vo8ESYu+G1qoxIIRAMLWhxz4m3ToLUWw032f5t4k2jIulXyqN91jXKb8e DrRxjcWGCMLCoNxou19L/fnY26v/iKuoZVVoWpG9KApy3thoHs/JYqYk5MKN8l5bQ6MZ Sn+gfW3bCptPc2Xsp2mFmxsX9TqgJw98ohA0kWwyvK/tcXQuCvwYZL+aNlW4P48yuSK8 aFN96BhSQhnHxQJS9XhUH+aOsgfFPxYgUDB+CUb5RvvU4lZ6F1sCOmzcE1/jR4JJ2l93 qqFQ== Received: by 10.68.227.136 with SMTP id sa8mr94277pbc.7.1336450399856; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.195.100 with SMTP id id4ls14908031pbc.8.gmail; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.218.10 with SMTP id pc10mr102610pbc.8.1336450399516; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by kw17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2c17b913e0ec281fcd51250c278639b5@sp.inri.net> References: <2c17b913e0ec281fcd51250c278639b5@sp.inri.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.62,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: Subject: Re: /dev/wsys/*/screen not present for nested rio? From: vrtra <9@vrtra.net> To: 9front <9front@googlegroups.com> X-Original-Sender: 9@vrtra.net X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9@vrtra.net designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9@vrtra.net; dkim=pass header.i=@vrtra.net Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnBiSI80b6pRz+rTXboqXej39YQEPWj6vbZ9/UuYOwHkGDEJOvJrb4D0TCI8lUIps5yAM/p > > I notice that /dev/wsys/*/screen is visible only on the top rio > > windows. If I start a nested rio instance, 'ls' still shows me that > > the file is present, but on access, it returns back saying file does > > not exist. > > Cannot reproduce. Make sure the screen number you are trying to access > actually exists in the nested rio. Compare the output of 'ls /dev/wsys' > in both the main rio and from within the nested rio. Thanks, actually cinap_lenrek told me that it is an intended behavior, that is rio/fsys.c has if(strcmp(x->wname[i], "screen")==0 && access("/dev/screen", AEXIST)==0) break; and it does not serve the screen in individual /dev/wsys because it is already provided in the /dev/screen. Though I suppose it would be interesting if I can get access to it. I was motivated by your example at http://9fans.net/archive/2012/04/204 to try and make a tiling window manager for rio. :) .