From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by ewsd; Fri Aug 21 15:25:33 EDT 2020 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39585C0239 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:25:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=vJVchq2sFGH+GLVpqdgXhgAeuC3a9zQ ZyEhXcbpXVE8=; b=E6fO/bnK64f8ncFFKWoV8dokWU/hKIj73dALUW0j8YKQ8U0 pYvgCaPwcWx10evnpq4l+pss+SzQsc6+V5MMowVu3PHREq9jblRRK12FdJVP/yxW IGROWk7q4JFoGMQCUjijmil3ulXkRdhi6jRcZZA3mSE5qY2fnf74i8VXWlB/YqYf CoFeEgc+xebtTQ9oPmJar135c8D/m0jaGUSadeERGaG0bgCGK0tMbyVqJYwg/aWZ QXgyC+tL+2KEtgqXuUYeBIo6845u0Js8LTdC6FtaCEERv35vB7WT7W5GJxOCuK78 6G3x9dorqCt8MQJQ/rEFwG1DNct+ca5hODUOp3g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=vJVchq 2sFGH+GLVpqdgXhgAeuC3a9zQZyEhXcbpXVE8=; b=B2/qjN/TdAvvhvnXFEfTwA ti/e3y0MCgugQ8c+X0fbSjoQrcfKTu+omsoGf49JhzjeDw1kWPdbiXrvN5bFMY27 RX3Tqks4tkGpxM7TeOG2eLCWDd+o5lWhnF9zs2JGQ0uZXUhsu1zKkdorDRaBjLGs FpbKh8MJi9nOY5hKNHsSnZEoO5P1bxM8C5ngz65/D83BpAX3KwCNBzZGk3XZy7OT TqmVuGtD3podY1klwiigVWfxjUpELQ35rz5X89564T3sM+9ICGkm6NDyjcbNADcU Yz/x5vTQxtkQvtTktx1vch6xCimOaGIAe8piIBnU09sRdThnWNqj4c/uT9kVEtNA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudduvddguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfgthhhrghnucfirghruggvnhgvrhdfuceovggvkhgv vgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheffteehuefhue efhfevueekhffghfetgeeikeeuheeuffdttdevuddthfekveevnecuffhomhgrihhnpeht hhgvtghomhhitghsvghrihgvshdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegvvghkvggvheejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 64EB414C00BC; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:25:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-214-g5a29d88-fm-20200818.002-g5a29d882 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <253CC91A3D00087821A92B6D43237A44@eigenstate.org> References: <253CC91A3D00087821A92B6D43237A44@eigenstate.org> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:25:10 +0100 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] minor bug report: png spews Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: markup descriptor On Fri, Aug 21, 2020, at 7:47 PM, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > > Hm. Does this happen on all PNG images? > If not, do you have an example image that triggers it? good question. it happens on all 3 png images i have on my 9front box. not a large sample, i know. at least 2 of them were produced by topng. here's 2 on the web: hget http://spazient.thecomicseries.com/images/comics/190/44807a1588321366b69316f455407560.png | png -9 > /dev/null hget http://spazient.thecomicseries.com/images/comics/190/44807a1587857865b69316f137336022.png | png -9 > /dev/null so it's still every image i've tried. > I haven't tested yet, but it looks like it's warning about > a possible miscomputation of image size. then why can't it happen for any case other than nineflag (-9), and why can't it happen with jpg's nineflag? i honestly think the calculation of len is just wrong, and if it were correct we'd never see the message.