From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ds.inri.net ([107.191.103.21]) by ur; Sun Mar 13 14:37:17 EDT 2016
Received: from dl.inri ([107.191.103.21]) by ds; Sun Mar 13 14:37:15 EDT 2016
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:37:07 -0400
From: sl@stanleylieber.com
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] g(1)
Message-ID: <db730826190a89f48ed2cd9d5510935e@dl.inri>
In-Reply-To: <48f9f7ccce26977678168b671c170623@meiling.znet>
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1603131222240.6016@phi>
	<48f9f7ccce26977678168b671c170623@meiling.znet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: responsive encrypted template element optimizer 

> On Sun Mar 13 07:24:13 EDT 2016, aiju@phicode.de wrote:
>> Should g(1) set "rfork e"?
> 
> /bin/psu is similarly structured and does so.
> What's the rule of thumb?

"Don't pollute the environment."

sl