From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 18063 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:04:35 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:04:35 -0000 Received: from mail-pg1-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:00:44 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-pg1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5a9bf4fbd3fso2927852a12.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:00:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698116441; x=1698721241; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xlJ5vEHXg0xdsy5/Wnukphka9fWMNR7+s3HlzqcQ7RY=; b=URauhGpfXpWv3Cg/ZhcVNvrSemnxQ7B49nCVPshX9EbxTRSF0Kc5rmoMgjwjiz+8ca nQL3EvbDcJJhzqyrAfFkjKIjCI4aoXaUjjFQBGYyWevz1V4YZPV/B6HyGArYLAzF/2KS ZUKH4EXRue/e14mP/Q77ByAHkfFmiTzjciuYKajI3aFomWtAgt8XgFco4oqunwI35525 H/Pvw2yK1qddkeUyqSUoH0g2GSzd0AYA8cRIqDFDHYb6WlPb93dA21eaPbhB+hYdLC+M tb7tHRJxYFuK5iu0iZKyh05HPMEh573ab1gJqn3bffGzSab4ounze3+DaAuB1N5xMlNW 8cfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698116441; x=1698721241; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xlJ5vEHXg0xdsy5/Wnukphka9fWMNR7+s3HlzqcQ7RY=; b=feNZkWGbA1E+G9WgYJd6cXHbOWsD5ll3RGRfEnkRGviOZhvcy1htw4rw48KtSGfdmf LEpZ8owOGxrmTFQSceAOZAh8iEh2mytaHIOBNegxOErNUplrMEJ62+EtBwYWkk8IGSn+ +USD1BzmJMk6qcK3eMYizbcqzER0GKeUeE05gEPxl20sb22A/9fVXSh0nf5L7Oy7lXnH hxCsUacS0iouNrRnxZL/5QxuVIT/QwLES/O4CY1razPJFWf3OOeDE9O/2B6lY4SILb9e eLSE033+UUfZ1Yw7RUiMnUY/vp5IkTLLZWhToiNVkI9v34IcNIF922GUnJa172YAOerR qnkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdiEAgj76oemUPVEkHvr22TQFUbgCKvHFx9utsya3tMj/+sEya sPSOQBJ+w7BddaCght7eFMR5JooDwx5HOA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHHLhIg7C2kt/j4dFS3lo5pHbDorR5YYB36AZLkcMV36b64mbkDAPbxQkhq/Hc0DSgQFiWR0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3284:b0:159:c2d0:9fc6 with SMTP id yt4-20020a056a21328400b00159c2d09fc6mr1780804pzb.8.1698116441327; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441? ([2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p20-20020a17090ad31400b0027d15bd9fa2sm7963736pju.35.2023.10.23.20.00.39 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:00:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Blue-Maned_Hawk X-Google-Original-From: Blue-Maned_Hawk Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:00:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid> <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: property realtime extension-based base Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 10/23/23 22:38, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 09:18:52PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: >> I made no insistence that it “should be obvious”. Contrary to your claim of >> loweffortness, I _did_ make an effort, that being to include only the needed >> information. > > You forgot to include any information supporting the implicit assumption > that people on this mailing list should give a shit that libaml does not > recognize opcode 0x86. Okay: it prevents batteries from being recognized as existing. Works that for you? > You have still failed to include any information > which would enable someone, in the event they unilaterally decided to > give a shit anyway, to do anything useful with the information you have > so inexpertly provided. I seen't what info'd be necessary. Please clarify. > In other words, you are not qualified to ascertain what information is > needed, and you did it wrong. For this, and many other reasons, I am > glad you can't get a battery readout on your (likely stolen) computer. That accusation of theft seems to me completely out of left field. Where on earth did you get it from?