From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19182 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2021 01:49:41 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Dec 2021 01:49:41 -0000 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]) by 4ess; Thu Dec 2 20:39:44 -0500 2021 Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:adr@sdf.org [205.166.94.16]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 1B31ZqUQ011990 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:35:53 GMT Received: from localhost (adr@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id 1B31ZuBO017651 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:35:56 GMT Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:35:56 +0000 (UTC) From: adr To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtualized abstract method-oriented cloud-oriented solution Subject: Re: [9front] bcm-audio Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, hiro wrote: > the hardware is the flaw, not the driver. Yeah, pwm audio is not the best, and the earliest boards had just rc filters with some diodes to protect the output. The latest have a buffer (and something else) chip which improve the output. > it's not worth it bec. 1$ usb-audio adaptors sound better than the rpi thing Yes but I dont' see code to control volume in nusb/audio/audio.c, only audiofreq and audiodelay. I will play with that after this. adr.