From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 759 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2022 20:21:58 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Nov 2022 20:21:58 -0000 Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Sat Nov 5 16:20:42 -0400 2022 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1667679754; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h3UyHFAL+NPIBfYMPKbbl8thx00f72jB9o9dGc8Nshg=; b=jnLiDqhLGZj5Tn/TnLwSiVrfvgFVt4xtsWTzaZiFW8Y81qlDXZbxrEOp94HGT9/kq1wKh2 GQp2itAGn86gWd651R+91hJXIMHcysM3sXwNF7iPgYJ2m7/6buoc4hTs8QjQMuPxNNS0aX 9FcHwC1WSoy1Pl4T67LOGJ2uP/wYAos= Received: from [192.168.168.200] (161-97-205-25.mynextlight.net [161.97.205.25]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 30a0485f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 15:22:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 14:18:18 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: <178724306.4357457.1667671046604@comcenter.netcologne.de> From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: <178724306.4357457.1667671046604@comcenter.netcologne.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: app configuration-aware controller Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] ethervgbe.c adjust blocksize for etheriq Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 11/5/22 11:57, Arne Meyer wrote: > Hello, > > ethervgbe appends the ethernet CRC to the block that is send up the stack. This not a problem for ip packets > but breaks aoe sanity checks. We don't use it anyway and FreeBSD and OpenBSD don't use it either. > > Greetings, > Arne Thanks! I realize now I also forgot to reply to your ipv6 patch mail, so thank you for that as well! Cheers, moody