From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6117F21500 for ; Thu, 2 May 2024 00:45:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Wed May 1 18:44:15 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1714603447; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UwSpzTzita4nWTEpzyBI6hT5uI7o2WzNo5WQIzyJRnk=; b=JfZESok8E0Gb+uE6UBhcwtUaMl0GmWMr9epkWhg3/d/vCef+HsFF0vVRqjUrYE9zWQHBQn Wfg2mJqv8wG67fViyzcoV/IalUZaMIX5IpmuAcS+j5DYt0Dm214vustCOqvMZ4LbagD3HX uIvwAaHVAaGMC3IvN4gg2ky1eBZpiYs= Received: from [192.168.168.200] ( [207.45.82.38]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4e3402bb (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 1 May 2024 17:44:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 17:44:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: hardware ACPI reduce/map just-in-time frontend Subject: Re: [9front] Request to include vcrop and vdir Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Based on what I've heard I'd say it more than passes the usefulness test. I also quite enjoy these programs. On 5/1/24 14:21, Igor Böhm wrote: > vdir and vcrop have become part and parcel of a set of tools I depend > on in my daily workflows and would therefore welcome their inclusion. > >> On 01.05.2024, at 20:03, phil9 wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Some (notorious) people suggested the inclusion of the two following >> tools I wrote: >> - vcrop (a visual image cropper): http://shithub.us/phil9/vcrop/HEAD/info.html >> - vdir (a visual directory browser): http://shithub.us/phil9/vdir/HEAD/info.html >> >> Is it ok to commit them ? >> >> I will write a proper man page for vdir first if it is to be included. >> >> cheers >> --phil >